Ghanaian Presidential candidate Kofi Akpaloo has sparked controversy by stating he will only approve of his daughter’s marriage if her suitor impregnates her first. His comments, aimed at avoiding societal stigma related to infertility, have drawn widespread criticism and sparked debate on gender equality and women’s rights in Ghana.... CLICK TO READ THE FULL NEWS HERE▶▶
Ghanaian Presidential candidate Kofi Akpaloo has sparked controversy with his recent comments about his daughter’s future marriage. Akpaloo, who is running for the Liberal Party of Ghana (LPG) in the 2024 general elections, stated that he would only approve of his daughter’s marriage if her suitor could impregnate her before the wedding.
He explained that his condition is aimed at avoiding the societal stigma and emotional stress often faced by women struggling to conceive after marriage.
Akpaloo’s remarks have ignited a wave of reactions on social media and beyond. Critics have accused him of promoting outdated and misogynistic views, arguing that a woman’s worth should not be tied to her ability to conceive. Some commentators have also expressed concern that such a stance might set a dangerous precedent for young women in Ghana.
However, a few supporters defended Akpaloo’s stance, claiming that he is merely trying to protect his daughter from potential future hardships. Despite attempts by the interviewer to persuade him to reconsider, Akpaloo remained firm in his position, asserting that he would reject any suitor who did not meet this condition.
The comments have since become a talking point in Ghana’s ongoing political discourse, with many questioning the implications of Akpaloo’s views on gender equality and women’s rights.
