Bunady
Former President Donald Trump speaks during a rally in Perry, Ga., on Sept. 25, 2021. Donald Trump suggests relocating displaced Palestinians to Egypt and Jordan, describing Gaza as a “demolition site” after recent devastation....TAP TO READ THE FULL CONTENT | TAP TO READ THE FULL CONTENT
He emphasizes that relocating residents could provide them a chance to live peacefully, while also planning military support for Israel
Former US President Donald Trump proposed relocating Gaza residents to Egypt and Jordan as part of his plan to address the ongoing conflict and facilitate peace in the Middle East.
Speaking aboard Air Force One, Trump described Gaza as a “demolition site” following the devastation from the war between Israel and Hamas and stated that he had spoken to Jordan’s King Abdullah II and planned to discuss the matter with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.
Key Points of Trump’s Proposal
Relocation of Residents: Trump suggested that Egypt and Jordan take in displaced Palestinians, either temporarily or as a long-term solution.
Humanitarian Justification: Trump emphasized the severe destruction in Gaza, claiming that relocating its 2.4 million residents could provide a chance for them to “live in peace for a change.”
Housing Plans: He hinted at involving Arab nations to build housing for displaced Gazans in new locations.
Military Support for Israel: Trump confirmed releasing a previously blocked shipment of 2,000-lb bombs for Israel, which he claimed had been delayed under the Biden administration.
For Palestinians, the idea of relocation evokes memories of the 1948 Nakba (catastrophe), during which many were displaced during the establishment of Israel.
Such proposals have been met with widespread criticism, as they risk repeating historical patterns of forced displacement.
While some right-wing members of the Israeli government have openly supported mass relocations, the Israeli administration has officially denied any plans to force Gazans to leave.
The proposal underscores Trump’s continued involvement in shaping Middle East policies, highlighting his administration’s pro-Israel stance and his previous claims about the potential development of Gaza.
However, the feasibility and ethical implications of such a plan remain highly contentious.
